<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	〈用 Google 的 Public DNS 上網會變快？Google的DNS真的比較快嗎？之常用DNS測試〉的留言	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.peterdavehello.org/2014/01/is_google_dns_faster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.peterdavehello.org/2014/01/is_google_dns_faster/</link>
	<description>To live is to make the world better.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2016 11:08:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		留言者: 搬新家來測試DNS速度之&#8230;終於證實用Google DNS上網會變快&#8230; &#124; Peter Dave Hello&#039;s Blog		</title>
		<link>https://www.peterdavehello.org/2014/01/is_google_dns_faster/#comment-50</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[搬新家來測試DNS速度之&#8230;終於證實用Google DNS上網會變快&#8230; &#124; Peter Dave Hello&#039;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2014 03:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterdavehello.org/?p=86#comment-50</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] 前兩次搬家的時候做過一次測試(用Google的Public DNS上網會變快？Google的DNS真的比較快嗎？之常用DNS測試)，這次搬新家再來小測一下~ [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] 前兩次搬家的時候做過一次測試(用Google的Public DNS上網會變快？Google的DNS真的比較快嗎？之常用DNS測試)，這次搬新家再來小測一下~ [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Object Caching 14/23 objects using APC
Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Content Delivery Network via cdn2.peterdavehello.org
Minified using Disk
Database Caching 1/25 queries in 0.010 seconds using APC (Request-wide modification query)

Served from: www.peterdavehello.org @ 2025-02-12 12:57:52 by W3 Total Cache
-->