11 web server online https/ssl testing services

http/2.0 will need encryption, also Google says HTTPS is a ranking signal – https://www.peterdavehello.org/2014/08/google-https-as-a-ranking-signal/, after set up https on our websever, what should we do next? It’s to confirm and make sure the cer and configure is safe enough to prevent from attack, here are some online testing service to help you confirm your cert and config on your webserver.

SSL Server Test by Qualys, Inc. SSL LABS (supports IPv6):
https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/
qualys_ssl_labs

qualys_ssl_labs_2

SSL Checker – SSL Certificate Verify:
https://www.sslshopper.com/ssl-checker.html

ssl_shopper

FairSSL BlueSSL Online Server SSL Test:
https://www.fairssl.se/en/ssltest

繼續閱讀

10 online continuous integration services for free.

Some online continuous integration services for free, it’s very important for free and open source project.

Free plan for open source project only:

繼續閱讀

瀏覽器綜合測試 on Windows

Opera 也開始改用 Webkit 了…有點可惜 這樣的 Opera 還是 Opera 嗎?

讓我們繼續看下去…

剛剛想說裝了 Opera Nex t(開始改用Webkit 的 Opera) 來測一下大家支援 HTML5 的狀況

平台是Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit SP1 以下按照分數高低排序

硬體的話就不提了 反正只是比較性而已

網址:
http://html5test.com

Google Chrome 27.0.1453.94 m
463 AND 13 BONUS POINTS
Opera Next 15.0.1147.18
433 AND 9 BONUS POINTS
Mozilla Firefox 21.0
399 AND 14 BONUS POINTS
Microsoft Internet Explorer 10.0.9200.16576 更新版本10.0.5
320 AND  6 BONUS POINTS

以上是在Windows平台上的最新穩定版本測試結果

其他小品牌或開發版、測試版、已經停止開發的就不一一測試了

還是希望HTML5盡早制定完成 也希望各家實作盡量一致並完整支援

這樣在開發web前端的時候可以輕鬆一點

後來想說順便測一下效能好了…

Browsermark 2.0(綜合測試):
http://browsermark.rightware.com

Google Chrome 27.0.1453.94 m
6271
Opera Next 15.0.1147.18
5987
Mozilla Firefox 21.0 
4810
Microsoft Internet Explorer 10.0.9200.16576 更新版本10.0.5 
4237

smashcat(測canvas):
http://www.smashcat.org/av/canvas_test/

Microsoft Internet Explorer 10.0.9200.16576 更新版本10.0.5 
305
Mozilla Firefox 21.0 
250
Opera Next 15.0.1147.18
170
Google Chrome 27.0.1453.94 m
59

Peacekeeper(測HTML5):
http://peacekeeper.futuremark.com/

Microsoft Internet Explorer 10.0.9200.16576 更新版本10.0.5
3277
Mozilla Firefox 21.0
3024
Google Chrome 27.0.1453.94 m
2557
Opera Next 15.0.1147.18(應該是因為webkit的關係被誤認為是Chrome)
2221

Kraken JavaScript Benchmark v1.1(顧名思義是測javascript):
http://krakenbenchmark.mozilla.org/kraken-1.1/driver.html

Opera Next 15.0.1147.181352.1ms
Google Chrome 27.0.1453.94 m1361.5ms
Mozilla Firefox 21.01647.9msMicrosoft Internet Explorer 10.0.9200.16576 更新版本10.0.54100.7ms

octane-benchmark (測javascript):
http://octane-benchmark.googlecode.com/svn/latest/index.html

Opera Next 15.0.1147.18
20493
Google Chrome 27.0.1453.94 m
17034
Mozilla Firefox 21.0
15104
Microsoft Internet Explorer 10.0.9200.16576 更新版本10.0.5
6587

sunspider(測javascript):
http://www.webkit.org/perf/sunspider-1.0/sunspider-1.0/driver.html

Opera Next 15.0.1147.18
143.3ms
Mozilla Firefox 21.0
148.0ms
Google Chrome 27.0.1453.94 m
1301.3ms
Microsoft Internet Explorer 10.0.9200.16576 更新版本10.0.5
顯示不出結果…

小發現是 不管在哪個測試 在複製貼上結果到編輯器的時候

Chrome和Opera會很完整的複製樣式 後兩名沒有 這大概是HTML5的關係~

另外這個微軟測試很明顯IE效能就比別人高超多…
http://ie.microsoft.com/testdrive/

我只選其中一項來測
http://ie.microsoft.com/testdrive/Performance/Minesweeper/

Microsoft Internet Explorer 10.0.9200.16576 更新版本10.0.5
1.0s
Mozilla Firefox 21.0
5.4s
Opera Next 15.0.1147.18
6.2s
Google Chrome 27.0.1453.94 m
6.3s

測試顯示圖形為預設的IE10,分數為花費秒數,越低越好,排名剛好倒過來

該不會是衝著Google或Webkit而來的吧XDDD

另外有一個WebVizBench(測HTML5)的網站:
http://webvizbench.com/

不過好像分數會受解析度影響…所以就中途作罷 懶得去細部調整讓個瀏覽器顯示範圍解析度完全一致…因為太麻煩了! 這點有點可惜

原則上上面的結果有加單位的數字越大是效能越差的意思,先後順序代表分數優劣

看起來是各有千秋…滿有趣的! 供各位參考~